UnivenIR

The relationship between leadership and local government on land allocation: A case of Thulamela Local Municipality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Netshandama, V. O.
dc.contributor.advisor Matshidze, P. E.
dc.contributor.author Makhanikhe, Tshimangadzo Justice
dc.date 2020
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-22T17:19:00Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-22T17:19:00Z
dc.date.issued 2022-07-15
dc.identifier.citation Makhanikhe, T. J. (2020) The relationship between leadership and local government on land allocation: A case of Thulamela Local Municipality. University of Venda. South Africa.<http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2246>.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2246
dc.description PhD (African Languages) en_ZA
dc.description Department of African Studies
dc.description.abstract Traditional leadership and local government are expected to provide co-leadership in same areas of jurisdiction, in South Africa, without much guidance on how that should be done. As a result, there is constant tension in the relationship and questioning between the two centers of power; tensions, such as those that largely exist around issues of land allocation and ownership. This study was aimed at exploring the relationship between traditional leadership and local government with regards to land allocation in the Thulamela local municipality. The study adopted a descriptive as well as an exploratory qualitative design. A total of 27 participants were involved in the study, namely, traditional leaders (14), municipal officials (03) who work on land issues and community members (10). Purposive and snowball sampling methods were employed to identify the (27) study participants, who were both male and female and the collected data was thematically analyzed. The findings of the study indicate that the relationship between traditional leadership and local government on land allocation in the Thulamela local municipality is largely conflictual rather than complementary. The conflictual relations partly emanate from the lack of clarification regarding each group’s distinctive roles regarding land allocation. The actions and or inactions of both parties could be attributed to the exercise of power and privileges of one over the other. Furthermore, the application and or disregard of the law is closely linked to interpretations and biases closely linked to the perceptions of powers and privileges. Traditional leaders seem to be the hardest hit, resulting in the blurring of their roles. I recommend establishment of clear and definitive roles for both institutions of leadership which must play a decisive role in land allocation. The study also recommends that there should be an introduction and facilitation of educational programs on land matters, to improve the relations between traditional leaders and local government. en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship NRF en_ZA
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xi, 255 leaves) :color leaves, color maps
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.subject Relationship en_ZA
dc.subject Traditional leadership en_ZA
dc.subject Local government en_ZA
dc.subject Interplay en_ZA
dc.subject Conflictual en_ZA
dc.subject Complementary en_ZA
dc.subject Land en_ZA
dc.subject Indigenous knowledge en_ZA
dc.subject Thulamela Municipality en_ZA
dc.subject Land access en_ZA
dc.title The relationship between leadership and local government on land allocation: A case of Thulamela Local Municipality en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnivenIR


Browse

My Account