Strategies for Enhancing Delivery of Beneficiary-preferred Low-cost Housing: A Case Study of Selected Rural Areas in Ephraim Mogale Local Municipality

Abstract

This cross-sectional survey focused on the intricate process of delivering low-cost housing in Moganyaka and Tsimanyane villages within Ephraim Mogale Local Municipality in South Africa. It aimed to uncover the multifaceted challenges that hinder timely and satisfactory housing provision. Sixty-six participants drawn from Moganyaka (31) and Tsimanyane (35) were sampled. A questionnaire that contained closed-ended questions was administered electronically via Google Forms. Timely delivery of low-cost housing in Moganyaka and Tsimanyane villages was explored, focusing on community preferences, satisfaction levels and viable strategies. Ethical procedures were followed, following steps that included obtaining clearance from the University of Venda Social Research Ethics Committee and securing entry for the study through engaging Traditional Councils in both villages. Data collection was carried out using an exploratory sequentially mixed method research design and involved pre-testing the questionnaire with entirely closed-ended questions. The questionnaire was administered via Google Forms from a total sample of 66 individuals drawn from both villages. Data analysis included crosstabulation and frequency computations, revealing insights into community preferences, satisfaction levels and challenges related to low-cost housing delivery. Demographic factors such as age and gender were observed to be playing a significant role. A higher participation rate from Tsimanyane Village compared to Moganyaka Village was observed, with a higher representation of females in both villages. This imbalance can be attributed to large numbers of males who migrate to other provinces for work opportunities, resulting in a high presence of female-headed households in rural areas. The age group distribution showed that the majority of participants in both villages were youth, highlighting the importance of addressing their needs and concerns. Timeliness of delivery and quality of low-cost housing projects were also explored, with notable concerns regarding project timelines, resource management, structural integrity and alignment with beneficiaries' preferences. Available literature emphasizes the importance of addressing the housing needs of low-income populations, especially in rural areas, and incorporating eco-friendly practices and energy-efficient technologies to enhance the sustainability and resilience of housing projects. Regarding the timeliness of delivery, the participants identified crucial criteria such as iii adherence to predetermined milestones, efficient resource management and streamlined administrative processes. Efficient resource management, regulatory compliance, community engagement, and sustainability were identified as critical factors in ensuring timely delivery and high-quality housing that meets beneficiaries' needs and preferences. Although there was agreement on good value and affordability, concerns about structural integrity, compliance with building regulations, and the visual appeal and functional design of housing units were revealed. In addition, there is a need for more attention to energy-efficient, durable housing. Streamlined processes, community engagement, technological integration and innovation, and risk management and capacity building for timely delivery of low-cost housing were found to be important. In conclusion, the importance of addressing the housing crisis for low-income populations through comprehensive approaches that consider efficient project management, regulatory compliance, community engagement and sustainability was highlighted. Thus, stakeholders can enhance beneficiary well-being and contribute to a more equitable and just society. The current study contributes to the field of rural development by proposing strategies for enhancing the delivery of beneficiary-preferred low-cost housing, which emphasizes the need for streamlined processes, effective resource allocation, technological integration, and community engagement. Addressing these areas helps stakeholders improve the overall effectiveness of low-cost housing initiatives and contribute to a more equitable and just society.