UnivenIR

Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Nkuna, N. W.
dc.contributor.advisor Thakhathi, D. R.
dc.contributor.author Tshigomana, Tshifularo Samuel
dc.date 2021
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-08T06:17:48Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-08T06:17:48Z
dc.date.issued 2021-10-10
dc.identifier.citation Tshigomana, T. S. (2021) Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District. University of Venda, South Africa.<http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755>.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755
dc.description PhD (Public Administration) en_ZA
dc.description Department of Public and Development Administration
dc.description.abstract This thesis presents a study of post-settlement challenges faced by land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province. Whilst it can be assumed that the government is attempting to address the challenges regarding the management of land reform processes in South Africa, with the aim of redressing the injustices in land ownership in South Africa, the land restitution beneficiaries, however, are faced with enormous challenges. This is evidenced by the continued increase in the collapse of the projects they have inherited. Many land reform projects have been implemented in South Africa since 1994, in an attempt to redress the imbalances in land ownership, and although, there is a general perception that many of these land reform projects are failing, there is limited evidence provided as to why these projects are failing and how such failures can be addressed (Lubambo, 2011:iv ). The aim of this study was to investigate the post-settlement challenges faced by land-restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District Municipality, through an empirical analysis of their impact on sustainable economic development. The study contributes by providing suggestions for the improvement of the lives of the land restitution beneficiaries through better management of their projects or land. The study, thus, was conducted to find solutions or a model that can be used in addressing the plight of the beneficiaries and to ensure the sustainability of projects for economic development. A mixed research method in which both quantitative and qualitative research approaches were used because they can be integrated in such a way that both methods retain their original structures and procedures. A qualitative approach was applicable, because it allows openness to ideas, experiences, opinions and feelings expressed by participants, while the quantitative approach allows a broader view which guarantees results from many respondents. Purposive sampling was used to select the respondents based entirely on the researcher’s judgment regarding the characteristics of the participants. Two instruments were used to collect data, namely, questionnaires and interviews. The reason for selecting the structured questionnaire and an open-ended interview schedule was to get sufficient relevant information about the study. To analyse data, two types of data analysis were used: for data collected through questionnaires, the Statistic Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used and for the data collected through interviews a thematic analysis of the respondents’ narratives was done. v The study showed that after the transfer of land to the beneficiaries, they are confronted by numerous challenges, such as - inability to access capital, group infighting, lack of adequate support from key stakeholders, corruption, as well as lack of communication and planning amongst the stakeholders. The study concluded that inappropriate planning and lack of post-settlement support impact negatively on sustainable economic development of the land restitution beneficiaries. The findings recommended the following specific solutions - developing a well-communicated Code of Conduct and Constitution which should be followed; the introduction of annual training on different skills, such as business and project management; extensive support from all the layers of government, especially, on the development of farmers and sourcing funding for them; development of a communication strategy, and the strengthening of the roles and responsibilities of the Communal Property Associations (CPAs). It is anticipated that these research results will help, regionally and internationally, states, policymakers and beneficiaries with similar challenges faced in South Africa, The limitations of the study were that the sample was predominantly black people as they are the main beneficiaries of the land reform programmes and the research was conducted only in the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province, which is just one of the fifty-two districts in South Africa. en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship NRF en_ZA
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xx, 268 leaves) : color illustrations, color maps
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.rights University of Venda
dc.subject Beneficiaries en_ZA
dc.subject Communal Property Association en_ZA
dc.subject Economic development en_ZA
dc.subject Land reform en_ZA
dc.subject Livelihood en_ZA
dc.subject Post-Settlement Support en_ZA
dc.subject Redistribution en_ZA
dc.subject Resettlement en_ZA
dc.subject Restitution and Sustainable en_ZA
dc.subject.ddc 333.3168257
dc.subject.lcsh Land reform -- South Africa -- Limpopo
dc.subject.lcsh Land reform beneficiaries -- South Africa -- Limpopo
dc.subject.lcsh Land settlement -- South Africa -- Limpopo
dc.subject.lcsh Agriculture and the state -- South Africa -- Limpopo
dc.subject.lcsh Land use, Rural -- South Africa -- Limpopo
dc.title Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District en_ZA
dc.type Thesis en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnivenIR


Browse

My Account