An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context

dc.contributor.advisorKujinga, B.
dc.contributor.authorMutsila, Magobe
dc.date2026
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-18T22:27:09Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-11
dc.descriptionMaster of Laws (LLM)
dc.descriptionDepartment of Public Law
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on the enforceability of International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrants by member states. The prosecutor of the ICC has the power to prosecute certain crimes committed by individual actors within the international community. Genocide is a crime under international law, and crimes of this nature are prosecuted by the ICC, when committed by member states against other states. The facts from the Russian war against Ukraine, and other regions underpin this study. This war resulted in the deaths of many Ukrainians, thus potentially amounting to genocide under international law. The ICC issued a warrant of arrest for President Putin, who to date has not been arrested. South Africa was expected to arrest President Putin if he visited the country, and this remains the expectation. The ICC’s prosecutors also applied for the issuing of warrants of arrest for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas's leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, which puts member states under an obligation to enforce the warrant. The application for the warrant against Prime Minister Netanyahu was made as a result of alleged genocide committed against the Palestinian people in Gaza. Both Russia and Israel are known to have strong military forces, which other member states like South Africa do not possess. The question arises whether member states with inferior military forces can enforce ICC arrest warrants against these powerful state leaders. Questions about the enforcement of ICC warrants also arise when considering global and regional economic and political alliances, such as the BRICS alliance, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, among others. The study argues that while inferior member states are under an obligation to enforce ICC warrants of arrest, there will always be an inherent fear of starting a war with member states such as Russia and Israel, who are in possession of powerful military forces, which complicates the enforcement of ICC warrants. The study also analyses the enforcement of ICC warrants in the context of global and regional political and economic alliances. A considered conclusion on the enforceability of ICC warrants in the above-mentioned contexts will be made at the end.
dc.format.extent1 online resource (viii, 71 leaves)
dc.identifier.apacitationMutsila, M. (2026). <i>An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context</i>. (). . Retrieved from en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationMutsila, Magobe. <i>"An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context."</i> ., , 2026. en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMutsila, M. 2026. An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context. . . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Dissertation AU - Mutsila, Magobe AB - This study focuses on the enforceability of International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrants by member states. The prosecutor of the ICC has the power to prosecute certain crimes committed by individual actors within the international community. Genocide is a crime under international law, and crimes of this nature are prosecuted by the ICC, when committed by member states against other states. The facts from the Russian war against Ukraine, and other regions underpin this study. This war resulted in the deaths of many Ukrainians, thus potentially amounting to genocide under international law. The ICC issued a warrant of arrest for President Putin, who to date has not been arrested. South Africa was expected to arrest President Putin if he visited the country, and this remains the expectation. The ICC’s prosecutors also applied for the issuing of warrants of arrest for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas's leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, which puts member states under an obligation to enforce the warrant. The application for the warrant against Prime Minister Netanyahu was made as a result of alleged genocide committed against the Palestinian people in Gaza. Both Russia and Israel are known to have strong military forces, which other member states like South Africa do not possess. The question arises whether member states with inferior military forces can enforce ICC arrest warrants against these powerful state leaders. Questions about the enforcement of ICC warrants also arise when considering global and regional economic and political alliances, such as the BRICS alliance, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, among others. The study argues that while inferior member states are under an obligation to enforce ICC warrants of arrest, there will always be an inherent fear of starting a war with member states such as Russia and Israel, who are in possession of powerful military forces, which complicates the enforcement of ICC warrants. The study also analyses the enforcement of ICC warrants in the context of global and regional political and economic alliances. A considered conclusion on the enforceability of ICC warrants in the above-mentioned contexts will be made at the end. DA - 2026-09-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - Univen KW - ICC KW - Genocide KW - War crimes KW - Crime against humanity KW - Aggression KW - Geneva Convention KW - International criminal law enforcement KW - Warrant of arrest KW - State Obligations KW - Universal jurisdiction KW - Rome Statute LK - http://univendspace.univen.ac.za PY - 2026 T1 - An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context TI - An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context UR - ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11602/3501
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationMutsila M. An analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context. []. , 2026 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.requiresPDF
dc.rightsUniversity of Venda
dc.subjectICC
dc.subjectGenocide
dc.subjectUCTDen_ZA
dc.subjectWar crimes
dc.subjectCrime against humanity
dc.subjectAggression
dc.subjectGeneva Convention
dc.subjectInternational criminal law enforcement
dc.subjectWarrant of arrest
dc.subjectState Obligations
dc.subjectUniversal jurisdiction
dc.subjectRome Statute
dc.subject.ddc341.5568
dc.subject.lcshInternational criminal courts -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcshCriminal courts -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcshInternational courts -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcshInternational offences -- South Africa
dc.titleAn analysis of the responsibility to enforce International Criminal Court warrants of arrest against alleged perpetrators of international crimes from a South African context
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dissertation - Mutsila, m.-.pdf
Size:
623.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Access status: Embargo until 2027-09-19 , Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: