UnivenIR

A systems perspective of information technology (IT) governance: A case of higher education institutions in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Ochara, N. M.
dc.contributor.advisor Kadyamatimba, A.
dc.contributor.author Ratshitanga, Nkhumbuleni Tendani
dc.date 2021
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-08T08:21:38Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-08T08:21:38Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09-30
dc.identifier.citation Ratshitanga, N. T. (2021) A systems perspective of information technology (IT) governance: A case of higher education institutions in South Africa. University of Venda, South Africa.<http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1760>.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1760
dc.description PhD (Business Information Systems) en_ZA
dc.description Department of Business Information Systems
dc.description.abstract Failure to implement Information Technology Governance (ITG) frameworks in universities contributes to making Information and Communication Technology (ICT) not aligned with the organizational objectives; as a result, implementation of ICT fails to create organizational value. The main objective of this study was to conceptualise a model that contributes to improving ITG in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Viable systems model was used as the theoretical underpinning to establish the determinants of effective ITG and to identify ITG mechanisms and their roles. The study adopted an interpretivist research paradigm. A case study research strategy was employed in HEIs. Purposive sampling was used to sample ITG role players to participate in the study; and interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data. Secondary data was collected through perusing ITG documents. The collected data was analysed using thematic content analysis and ATLAS ti 8 software that was used. The results showed the following ITG determinants: complexity in terms of internetworking and interrelatedness of ITG mechanisms, synergy of and within ITG mechanisms, ability of ITG to respond to environmental changes, local autonomy in relation to decisions taken in different ITG levels, recursive within the HEIs ITG system and direct feedback among different ITG in HEIs. The results also showed ITG mechanisms and their roles. Council, ICT steering committee, CIO, Risk Committee and Audit Committee were amongst the identified ITG mechanism. The study concluded that Council is responsible for strategic envisioning; executive management is responsible for planning; Chief Information Officer (CIO) controls and directs ITG activities, ICT Steering Committee coordinates the development and implementation, Risk Committee and Audit Committee monitor the process, the ICT department; under the supervision of the CIO; and Sections within the ICT department are hands on regarding the implementation. The VIVHO ITG model is the outcome of the synthesis of the identified ITG determinants and ITG mechanisms. en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship NRF en_ZA
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xvii, 348 leaves ) : color illustrations
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.rights University of Venda
dc.subject IT governance en_ZA
dc.subject IT governance mechanisms en_ZA
dc.subject IT governance determinants en_ZA
dc.subject ICT strategy en_ZA
dc.subject Systems Thinking en_ZA
dc.subject.ddc 378.68
dc.subject.lcsh Computer-assisted instructions -- Programming
dc.subject.lcsh Education -- Data processing
dc.subject.lcsh Information technology -- Management
dc.subject.lcsh Management information systems
dc.subject.lcsh Universities and colleges -- Data processing
dc.title A systems perspective of information technology (IT) governance: A case of higher education institutions in South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Thesis en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnivenIR


Browse

My Account