Tshovhewaho, O. I.Makhado, M. P.Muwawa, Fhedzisani2026-07-162026-07-162026-05-19Muwawa, F. 2026. The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa. . .https://univendspace.univen.ac.za/handle/11602/3355Masters in Language Practice (MALP)Department of African LanguagesThis study investigates the impact of non-professional interpreters in selected courtrooms of the Vhembe District. Korpal (2012) emphasised that employing non-professional interpreters in courtrooms can lead to serious issues, including misinterpretation of legal terminology, inaccurate translations, and violations of the accused person’s rights to a fair trial. Interpreters should be properly trained and not rely solely on their language skills. Training provides them with essential knowledge, skills, and ethical standards to perform professionally. Nonetheless, the Department of Justice in Limpopo continues to use non-professional interpreters who lack qualifications or knowledge. This study aims to assess the impact of untrained interpreters and whether their presence aids effective communication between litigants. Adopting a qualitative approach, as described by Van der Merwe (Garbers, 1996), this research sought to develop theories and understanding by exploring human behaviour and its underlying reasons. It investigates why and how decisions are made, often focusing on specific samples. Qualitative methods allow for detailed probing based on respondents’ answers. The study used the Gatekeeping Theory, which emphasises the interpreter's important role in managing information flow between speakers of different languages (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009: 265). Results indicate that most interpreters hired in courtrooms are bilingual or multilingual but not necessarily qualified, which negatively influences case outcomes. Keywords: C1 online resource (x, 149 leaves)enUniversity of VendaCourtroomsUCTDMisinterpretationInterpretersNon-professionalTerminologyTheoriesThe Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South AfricaDissertationMuwawa F. The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa. []. , 2026 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from:Muwawa, F. (2026). <i>The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa</i>. (). . Retrieved fromMuwawa, Fhedzisani. <i>"The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa."</i> ., , 2026.TY - Dissertation AU - Muwawa, Fhedzisani AB - This study investigates the impact of non-professional interpreters in selected courtrooms of the Vhembe District. Korpal (2012) emphasised that employing non-professional interpreters in courtrooms can lead to serious issues, including misinterpretation of legal terminology, inaccurate translations, and violations of the accused person’s rights to a fair trial. Interpreters should be properly trained and not rely solely on their language skills. Training provides them with essential knowledge, skills, and ethical standards to perform professionally. Nonetheless, the Department of Justice in Limpopo continues to use non-professional interpreters who lack qualifications or knowledge. This study aims to assess the impact of untrained interpreters and whether their presence aids effective communication between litigants. Adopting a qualitative approach, as described by Van der Merwe (Garbers, 1996), this research sought to develop theories and understanding by exploring human behaviour and its underlying reasons. It investigates why and how decisions are made, often focusing on specific samples. Qualitative methods allow for detailed probing based on respondents’ answers. The study used the Gatekeeping Theory, which emphasises the interpreter's important role in managing information flow between speakers of different languages (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009: 265). Results indicate that most interpreters hired in courtrooms are bilingual or multilingual but not necessarily qualified, which negatively influences case outcomes. Keywords: C DA - 2026-05-19 DB - ResearchSpace DP - Univen KW - Courtrooms KW - Misinterpretation KW - Interpreters KW - Non-professional KW - Terminology KW - Theories LK - https://univendspace.univen.ac.za PY - 2026 T1 - The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa TI - The Impact of Non-professional Interpreting in Some Selected Courtrooms of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province in South Africa UR - ER -