<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T16:55:14Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/2433" metadataPrefix="dim">https://univendspace.univen.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/2433</identifier><datestamp>2024-09-10T14:39:49Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11602_2111</setSpec><setSpec>col_11602_2112</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Sebola, M. P. (Chief Editor)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Molokwane, T. S. (Quest Editor)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Somfongo, K.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date">2022</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2023-04-10T20:43:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2023-04-10T20:43:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-09-14</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation">Somfongo, K. (2022) Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University. Proceedings of the International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives.&amp;lt;http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433&amp;gt;.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="isbn">9780992197193 (Print)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="isbn">9780992197186 (e-book)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="vancouvercitation" lang="en_ZA">Somfongo K. Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="apacitation" lang="en_ZA">Somfongo, K. (2022). Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="chicagocitation" lang="en_ZA">Somfongo, K. &amp;quot;Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University.&amp;quot; (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="ris" lang="en_ZA">&#xd;
TY  - Article&#xd;
AU  - Somfongo, K.&#xd;
AB  - There are challenges in the process of aligning teaching and learning with assessment methods&#xd;
available, especially in the transformation phase of South African universities. It is believed that there is either&#xd;
an improper implementation of the process of constructive alignment in the Economics modules or improper&#xd;
module design in aligning teaching with assessment. This paper intends to investigate if the lecturers complied&#xd;
with the principles of constructive alignment (CA) as a case study in Economics education at a comprehensive&#xd;
university in South Africa. A qualitative investigation of 13 out of 19 Economics lecturers from four campuses of&#xd;
the comprehensive university participated in three focus group discussions. To these focus groups discussions,&#xd;
an interview guide was designed based on the study. The instructional materials and assessment tasks designed&#xd;
by these lecturers were also analysed by means of a checklist containing important elements of CA. The major&#xd;
findings of the investigation included the following: In most of the Economics modules, objectives were still&#xd;
used; lecturers were not consciously working towards aligning the ILOs/objectives, TLAs and ATs but mostly&#xd;
relied on intuition and rather focused on prescribed content, textbooks and conventional TLAs as a basis for&#xd;
planning their teaching and assessment. Some of lecturers interviewed clearly did not think it was necessary&#xd;
to educate the students in terms of the relevant ILOs or objectives and did not use assessment criteria and&#xd;
rubrics for assessment, indicating a lack of transparency in the assessment process. The university also still&#xd;
uses a quantitative approach in assessing the knowledge and skills of students. It is advisable that Economics&#xd;
Lectures plan together and use common guides, teaching, and learning material for effective constructive&#xd;
alignment of the Economics subject.&#xd;
DA  - 2022-09-14&#xd;
DB  - ResearchSpace&#xd;
DP  - Univen&#xd;
KW  - Constructive alignment&#xd;
KW  - Teaching and learning activities&#xd;
KW  - Assessment tasks&#xd;
KW  - Quantitative approach&#xd;
KW  - Instructional materials&#xd;
KW  - Intended learning outcomes&#xd;
LK  - https://univendspace.univen.ac.za&#xd;
PY  - 2022&#xd;
SM  - 9780992197193 (Print)&#xd;
SM  - 9780992197186 (e-book)&#xd;
T1  - Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University&#xd;
TI  - Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University&#xd;
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/11602/2433&#xd;
ER  - &#xd;
</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_ZA">Journal articles for The 7th Annual International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 14 - 16 September 2022</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_ZA">There are challenges in the process of aligning teaching and learning with assessment methods&#xd;
available, especially in the transformation phase of South African universities. It is believed that there is either&#xd;
an improper implementation of the process of constructive alignment in the Economics modules or improper&#xd;
module design in aligning teaching with assessment. This paper intends to investigate if the lecturers complied&#xd;
with the principles of constructive alignment (CA) as a case study in Economics education at a comprehensive&#xd;
university in South Africa. A qualitative investigation of 13 out of 19 Economics lecturers from four campuses of&#xd;
the comprehensive university participated in three focus group discussions. To these focus groups discussions,&#xd;
an interview guide was designed based on the study. The instructional materials and assessment tasks designed&#xd;
by these lecturers were also analysed by means of a checklist containing important elements of CA. The major&#xd;
findings of the investigation included the following: In most of the Economics modules, objectives were still&#xd;
used; lecturers were not consciously working towards aligning the ILOs/objectives, TLAs and ATs but mostly&#xd;
relied on intuition and rather focused on prescribed content, textbooks and conventional TLAs as a basis for&#xd;
planning their teaching and assessment. Some of lecturers interviewed clearly did not think it was necessary&#xd;
to educate the students in terms of the relevant ILOs or objectives and did not use assessment criteria and&#xd;
rubrics for assessment, indicating a lack of transparency in the assessment process. The university also still&#xd;
uses a quantitative approach in assessing the knowledge and skills of students. It is advisable that Economics&#xd;
Lectures plan together and use common guides, teaching, and learning material for effective constructive&#xd;
alignment of the Economics subject.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">1  online resource (8 pages)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_ZA">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_ZA">International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="relation" qualifier="requires">PDF</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Constructive alignment</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">UCTD</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Teaching and learning activities</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Assessment tasks</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Quantitative approach</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Instructional materials</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Intended learning outcomes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_ZA">Constructive Alignment in the Learning and Teaching of Economics at a Comprehensive University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_ZA">Article</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>