2026-09-18T16:55:52Zhttps://univendspace.univen.ac.za/server/oai/request

oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/18602024-09-10T14:41:42Zcom_11602_2111col_11602_2112

Sebola, M. P. (Chief Editor) Molokwane, T. (Quest Editor) Dzaga, T. V. 2022-02-17T20:09:45Z 2022-02-17T20:09:45Z 2021 Dzaga, T. V. 2021. Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda. Proceedings of the International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA). 399-407. <http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860>. 978-0-620-92730-7 (print) 978-0-620-92751-2 (e-book) http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860 Dzaga T V. Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda. 2021; http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860. Dzaga, T. V. (2021). Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860 Dzaga, T. V. "Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda." (2021) http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860 TY - Article AU - Dzaga, T. V. AB - This study evaluates the process of monitoring the performance and productivity of staff working remotely amid the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has profound impact on how different institutions operate, especially on ensuring effective performance management of employees working remotely. Despite all odds, some workers continue working remotely during these extraordinary circumstances. There is a need to acknowledge that the world has changed and that these changes could last for some time, and perhaps even more permanently. A sample of 80 and 10 participants for quantitative and qualitative, respectively, was chosen to fully represent the staff. The data collection methods included interviews and questionnaires with selected staff. The Convenience Sampling Method was used to select respondents amongst staff members assigned to work remotely based on the fact that they were either sharing office with colleagues or had capacity to work remotely. The questionnaires were physically administered by the Researcher, whereas interviews were conducted with individual staff. Quantitative data was analysed through SPSS software, and qualitative data was analysed through themes and coding. The study revealed that some staff members are not ethical when working from home with minimal supervision. The study also revealed that when staff are not closely monitored, they tend not to focus and spend some time performing non-work-related activities which negatively affects the performance and productivity of the institution. The study further revealed that remote working led to poor quality of reports and missing of deadlines, signifying lack of proper planning. DA - 2021 DB - ResearchSpace DP - Univen KW - Business continuity KW - Effective communication KW - Staff performance monitoring KW - Remote worker productivity LK - https://univendspace.univen.ac.za PY - 2021 SM - 978-0-620-92730-7 (print) SM - 978-0-620-92751-2 (e-book) T1 - Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda TI - Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1860 ER - Journal articles published in the 6th International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA), 06-08 October 2021, Virtual Conference. This study evaluates the process of monitoring the performance and productivity of staff working remotely amid the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has profound impact on how different institutions operate, especially on ensuring effective performance management of employees working remotely. Despite all odds, some workers continue working remotely during these extraordinary circumstances. There is a need to acknowledge that the world has changed and that these changes could last for some time, and perhaps even more permanently. A sample of 80 and 10 participants for quantitative and qualitative, respectively, was chosen to fully represent the staff. The data collection methods included interviews and questionnaires with selected staff. The Convenience Sampling Method was used to select respondents amongst staff members assigned to work remotely based on the fact that they were either sharing office with colleagues or had capacity to work remotely. The questionnaires were physically administered by the Researcher, whereas interviews were conducted with individual staff. Quantitative data was analysed through SPSS software, and qualitative data was analysed through themes and coding. The study revealed that some staff members are not ethical when working from home with minimal supervision. The study also revealed that when staff are not closely monitored, they tend not to focus and spend some time performing non-work-related activities which negatively affects the performance and productivity of the institution. The study further revealed that remote working led to poor quality of reports and missing of deadlines, signifying lack of proper planning. 1 online resource (8 pages) en International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA) Business continuity UCTD Effective communication Staff performance monitoring Remote worker productivity Monitoring Remote Workers Productivity in Institutions of Higher Learning: A Case of the University of Venda Article PDF open.access