<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T05:19:54Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/1755" metadataPrefix="dim">https://univendspace.univen.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/1755</identifier><datestamp>2024-09-10T14:22:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11602_1956</setSpec><setSpec>com_11602_1940</setSpec><setSpec>com_11602_1895</setSpec><setSpec>com_11602_737</setSpec><setSpec>col_11602_2171</setSpec><setSpec>col_11602_738</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Nkuna, N. W.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Thakhathi, D. R.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Tshigomana, Tshifularo Samuel</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date">2021</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2021-12-08T06:17:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2021-12-08T06:17:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2021-10-10</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation">Tshigomana, T. S. (2021)  Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District. University of Venda, South Africa.&amp;lt;http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755&amp;gt;.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="vancouvercitation" lang="en_ZA">Tshigomana TS. Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District. []. , 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="apacitation" lang="en_ZA">Tshigomana, T. S. (2021). &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;. (). . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="chicagocitation" lang="en_ZA">Tshigomana, Tshifularo Samuel. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; ., , 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="ris" lang="en_ZA">&#xd;
TY  - Thesis&#xd;
AU  - Tshigomana, Tshifularo Samuel&#xd;
AB  - This thesis presents a study of post-settlement challenges faced by land restitution beneficiaries&#xd;
in the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province. Whilst it can be assumed that the government&#xd;
is attempting to address the challenges regarding the management of land reform processes in&#xd;
South Africa, with the aim of redressing the injustices in land ownership in South Africa, the&#xd;
land restitution beneficiaries, however, are faced with enormous challenges. This is evidenced&#xd;
by the continued increase in the collapse of the projects they have inherited. Many land reform&#xd;
projects have been implemented in South Africa since 1994, in an attempt to redress the&#xd;
imbalances in land ownership, and although, there is a general perception that many of these&#xd;
land reform projects are failing, there is limited evidence provided as to why these projects are&#xd;
failing and how such failures can be addressed (Lubambo, 2011:iv ). The aim of this study was&#xd;
to investigate the post-settlement challenges faced by land-restitution beneficiaries in the&#xd;
Vhembe District Municipality, through an empirical analysis of their impact on sustainable&#xd;
economic development. The study contributes by providing suggestions for the improvement&#xd;
of the lives of the land restitution beneficiaries through better management of their projects or&#xd;
land. The study, thus, was conducted to find solutions or a model that can be used in addressing&#xd;
the plight of the beneficiaries and to ensure the sustainability of projects for economic&#xd;
development.&#xd;
A mixed research method in which both quantitative and qualitative research approaches were&#xd;
used because they can be integrated in such a way that both methods retain their original&#xd;
structures and procedures. A qualitative approach was applicable, because it allows openness&#xd;
to ideas, experiences, opinions and feelings expressed by participants, while the quantitative&#xd;
approach allows a broader view which guarantees results from many respondents. Purposive&#xd;
sampling was used to select the respondents based entirely on the researcher’s judgment&#xd;
regarding the characteristics of the participants. Two instruments were used to collect data,&#xd;
namely, questionnaires and interviews. The reason for selecting the structured questionnaire&#xd;
and an open-ended interview schedule was to get sufficient relevant information about the&#xd;
study. To analyse data, two types of data analysis were used: for data collected through&#xd;
questionnaires, the Statistic Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used and for the data&#xd;
collected through interviews a thematic analysis of the respondents’ narratives was done.&#xd;
v&#xd;
The study showed that after the transfer of land to the beneficiaries, they are confronted by&#xd;
numerous challenges, such as - inability to access capital, group infighting, lack of adequate&#xd;
support from key stakeholders, corruption, as well as lack of communication and planning&#xd;
amongst the stakeholders.&#xd;
The study concluded that inappropriate planning and lack of post-settlement support impact&#xd;
negatively on sustainable economic development of the land restitution beneficiaries. The&#xd;
findings recommended the following specific solutions - developing a well-communicated&#xd;
Code of Conduct and Constitution which should be followed; the introduction of annual&#xd;
training on different skills, such as business and project management; extensive support from&#xd;
all the layers of government, especially, on the development of farmers and sourcing funding&#xd;
for them; development of a communication strategy, and the strengthening of the roles and&#xd;
responsibilities of the Communal Property Associations (CPAs). It is anticipated that these&#xd;
research results will help, regionally and internationally, states, policymakers and beneficiaries&#xd;
with similar challenges faced in South Africa,&#xd;
The limitations of the study were that the sample was predominantly black people as they are&#xd;
the main beneficiaries of the land reform programmes and the research was conducted only in&#xd;
the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province, which is just one of the fifty-two districts in&#xd;
South Africa.&#xd;
DA  - 2021-10-10&#xd;
DB  - ResearchSpace&#xd;
DP  - Univen&#xd;
KW  - Beneficiaries&#xd;
KW  - Communal Property Association&#xd;
KW  - Economic development&#xd;
KW  - Land reform&#xd;
KW  - Livelihood&#xd;
KW  - Post-Settlement Support&#xd;
KW  - Redistribution&#xd;
KW  - Resettlement&#xd;
KW  - Restitution and Sustainable&#xd;
LK  - https://univendspace.univen.ac.za&#xd;
PY  - 2021&#xd;
T1  - Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District&#xd;
TI  - Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District&#xd;
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1755&#xd;
ER  - &#xd;
</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_ZA">PhD (Public Administration)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description">Department of Public and Development Administration</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_ZA">This thesis presents a study of post-settlement challenges faced by land restitution beneficiaries&#xd;
in the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province. Whilst it can be assumed that the government&#xd;
is attempting to address the challenges regarding the management of land reform processes in&#xd;
South Africa, with the aim of redressing the injustices in land ownership in South Africa, the&#xd;
land restitution beneficiaries, however, are faced with enormous challenges. This is evidenced&#xd;
by the continued increase in the collapse of the projects they have inherited. Many land reform&#xd;
projects have been implemented in South Africa since 1994, in an attempt to redress the&#xd;
imbalances in land ownership, and although, there is a general perception that many of these&#xd;
land reform projects are failing, there is limited evidence provided as to why these projects are&#xd;
failing and how such failures can be addressed (Lubambo, 2011:iv ). The aim of this study was&#xd;
to investigate the post-settlement challenges faced by land-restitution beneficiaries in the&#xd;
Vhembe District Municipality, through an empirical analysis of their impact on sustainable&#xd;
economic development. The study contributes by providing suggestions for the improvement&#xd;
of the lives of the land restitution beneficiaries through better management of their projects or&#xd;
land. The study, thus, was conducted to find solutions or a model that can be used in addressing&#xd;
the plight of the beneficiaries and to ensure the sustainability of projects for economic&#xd;
development.&#xd;
A mixed research method in which both quantitative and qualitative research approaches were&#xd;
used because they can be integrated in such a way that both methods retain their original&#xd;
structures and procedures. A qualitative approach was applicable, because it allows openness&#xd;
to ideas, experiences, opinions and feelings expressed by participants, while the quantitative&#xd;
approach allows a broader view which guarantees results from many respondents. Purposive&#xd;
sampling was used to select the respondents based entirely on the researcher’s judgment&#xd;
regarding the characteristics of the participants. Two instruments were used to collect data,&#xd;
namely, questionnaires and interviews. The reason for selecting the structured questionnaire&#xd;
and an open-ended interview schedule was to get sufficient relevant information about the&#xd;
study. To analyse data, two types of data analysis were used: for data collected through&#xd;
questionnaires, the Statistic Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used and for the data&#xd;
collected through interviews a thematic analysis of the respondents’ narratives was done.&#xd;
v&#xd;
The study showed that after the transfer of land to the beneficiaries, they are confronted by&#xd;
numerous challenges, such as - inability to access capital, group infighting, lack of adequate&#xd;
support from key stakeholders, corruption, as well as lack of communication and planning&#xd;
amongst the stakeholders.&#xd;
The study concluded that inappropriate planning and lack of post-settlement support impact&#xd;
negatively on sustainable economic development of the land restitution beneficiaries. The&#xd;
findings recommended the following specific solutions - developing a well-communicated&#xd;
Code of Conduct and Constitution which should be followed; the introduction of annual&#xd;
training on different skills, such as business and project management; extensive support from&#xd;
all the layers of government, especially, on the development of farmers and sourcing funding&#xd;
for them; development of a communication strategy, and the strengthening of the roles and&#xd;
responsibilities of the Communal Property Associations (CPAs). It is anticipated that these&#xd;
research results will help, regionally and internationally, states, policymakers and beneficiaries&#xd;
with similar challenges faced in South Africa,&#xd;
The limitations of the study were that the sample was predominantly black people as they are&#xd;
the main beneficiaries of the land reform programmes and the research was conducted only in&#xd;
the Vhembe District in the Limpopo Province, which is just one of the fifty-two districts in&#xd;
South Africa.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="sponsorship" lang="en_ZA">NRF</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">1 online resource (xx, 268 leaves) : color illustrations, color maps</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_ZA">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">University of Venda</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Beneficiaries</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">UCTD</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Communal Property Association</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Economic development</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Land reform</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Livelihood</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Post-Settlement Support</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Redistribution</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Resettlement</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_ZA">Restitution and Sustainable</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="ddc">333.3168257</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh">Land reform -- South Africa -- Limpopo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh">Land reform beneficiaries -- South Africa -- Limpopo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh">Land settlement -- South Africa -- Limpopo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh">Agriculture and the state -- South Africa  -- Limpopo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="lcsh">Land use, Rural -- South Africa -- Limpopo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_ZA">Post-settlement challenges on land restitution beneficiaries in the Vhembe District</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_ZA">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>