UnivenIR

Resilience to crusting of soils under conventional tillage and conservation agriculture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wakindiki, I.
dc.contributor.advisor Odhiambo, J. J. O.
dc.contributor.author Tshigoli, Vhonani Lucadia
dc.date 2020
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-04T06:24:13Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-04T06:24:13Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03
dc.identifier.citation Tshigoli, Vhonani Lucadia (2020) Resilience to crusting of soils under conventional tillage and conservation agriculture. University of Venda, South Africa.<http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1628>.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1628
dc.description MSCAGR (Soil Science) en_ZA
dc.description Department of Soil Science
dc.description.abstract Soil resilience is the ability of a soil to recover its function or capacity after applied stress such as crusting. Some soils have high potential for recovery while others have poor resilience. Soils with poor resilience are much more vulnerable to degradation. Many soils in South Africa are susceptible to crust formation, which affects many soil surface properties and processes and hence productivity. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate how soil resilience to crust formation is affected by conventional tillage and conservation agriculture in selected soils in South Africa. Soil samples were collected from four different soils (Hutton, Shortland, Glenrosa and Dundee) using PVC pipes with the length of 20 cm and diameter of 5cm and scanned using micro xray computed tomography for total pores. Total porosity from Luvisols, Ferrosols, Leptsols and Fluvisols under both conventional tillage and conservation agriculture was used to find soil resilience index. Soil crusting was influenced by both soil texture and clay mineralogy. The dominance of kaolinitic mineral caused the soil to be more stable as compared to soil dominated by quartz. Luvisols, Ferrosols and Leptsols were more stable and had aggregate stability of 57%, 69,5% and 32,7%, respectively. On the other hand, Fluvisols had poor aggregate stability with the value of 14,2%. Total porosity was in the order of 34,3%>32,2%>23,5%>16,3% for Ferrosols, Luvisols, Leptsols and Fluvisols, respectively. Soil crusting influenced the total porosity. Tillage practices had influence on soil crust formation hence, total porosity of the soils. Total porosity was higher under conservation agriculture as compare to conventional tillage. Resilience total porosity was in the order of 37,5> 23,9> 4,1> -30,1 on Luvisols, Ferrosols, Leptsols and Fluvisols, respectively. Soil resilience to crust formation was influenced by tillage practices. Soil resilience of Luvisols, Ferrosols and Leptsols can be achieved through conservation agriculture however, soil resilience of Fluvisols can be achieved through conventional tillage. en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship NRF en_ZA
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (viii, 47 leaves : color illustrations, color maps)
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.rights University of Venda
dc.subject Soil resilience en_ZA
dc.subject Soil crusting en_ZA
dc.subject Soil structure en_ZA
dc.subject Aggregate stability en_ZA
dc.subject Tillage practices en_ZA
dc.subject Conservation agriculture en_ZA
dc.title Resilience to crusting of soils under conventional tillage and conservation agriculture en_ZA
dc.type Dissertation en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnivenIR


Browse

My Account